I Forgot

By -
The reason I mentioned Laffer and the Republicans' tax increase assumptions in the first place was this article by Ralph Rector of the Heritage Foundation. Rector projects that even if the top two income tax bracket rates were restored to Clinton-era levels, the increased tax revenues would amount to just $163 billion over a six-year period from 2005 to 2010.


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Predictions (Part II)

By -
Unfortunately, I believe the vote count to be much closer than my friend Stephen does. My predictions: Bush electoral votes: 270 Kerry electoral votes: 268 Switching to Red: Hawaii, Iowa, New Mexico Switching to Blue: New Hampshire, Ohio Popular vote: Bush 50.1, Kerry 48.5 Senate: GOP picks up 2. House: GOP nets 5. Should Colorado split its vote, Lt. Kerry reports for duty (with Bush still winning the popular vote). I suppose the only consolation for such a circumstance would be the deafening silence on the topic of reforming the electoral college.
Read more

Me and My Sox

By -
My beloved Boston Red Sox are up 2-0 in the World Series, and I am simply too dumbfounded and fearful to say much about it. Red Sox fans come in two flavors: Sun-is-always-shining optimists and world-is-about-to-end pessimists. In 1990, the Red Sox were down to Oakland 3-0 in the ALCS. A "sunny" friend of mine insisted our team was better, and we would win the series despite the odds. Not that they "had a chance" but that they would win. This is the same kind of person who, every spring, and after every three-game win streak, says "This is the year!" So what of The Curse? The strange thing is that the sunny-siders tend to believe in it as much as anyone else. The just think it's due to end this year (every year). On the other hand, you have us doom-and-gloomers. We don't have this attitude because we like being crotchety. On the contrary, many of us are considered optimists on most other subjects, and can have seemingly completely normal ...
Read more

ChatGPT: Trust, but verify? Or don't trust at all? It's getting dangerous

By -
Image
 Like many people who have been studying artificial intelligence, I was interested to try out the new OpenAI-based ChatGPT interface. Early reports suggest it is good at telling stories, and perhaps plays a little fast and loose with facts. The promise of a general AI bot is captivating. The power of the entire Internet to provide information, natural language processing to figure out what you're looking for and how to respond in a way that's useful, and of course the ability for computers to do what they were originally designed to do: compute. It will make suggestions based on thousands of calculations, all in a few seconds. What if its calculations are wrong? I ran a test today that I expected ChatGPT to ace. It was simple: how much money can you get in a standard briefcase? I knew it would have to do some searching to find the dimensions of bills, the dimensions of briefcases, and do a little math. This could be extended to see how much money could fit in a swimming pool, e...
Read more